Infrastructure

Limited Options

Today the city of Kalamazoo will be turning off the water to a series of properties that includes my workplace. The general statement is that the water will be off from 9am to 4pm today, although of course, they will endeavor to not let it be off for any longer than it really has to be.

This event got me thinking about the topic of infrastructure. How much of the first world lifestyle is possible because of things none of us see or notice until they are gone. It’s a curse of ubiquity and constancy, everywhere you go there is running water, there has rarely ever been situations where running water was not available, so then, what happens when it’s gone? There are so many pieces to modern living that we all take for granted and in doing so we have become functionally dependent on these things. This is a savage dependency, without running water, electricity, fuel, and information services how can the average of us cope? That’s both fascinating and terrifying. To see how average folk would respond to the sudden loss of first-world fundamental services, to the failure of first-world infrastructure is a possibility to see how we can cope and the terror that will descend upon us when we find we cannot cope.

Politics touches on so much of our lives, and even here in terms of infrastructure it lumbers along. How much time and energy have we invested in our roads, in our electrical systems, our fuel delivery systems and our water systems? We used to before we spent all our money on wars, but now? Ever since the I-35W Bridge failed the nation turned at least one wary eye to the conditions of our infrastructure. How much of it is rotting away, needs maintenance, needs money. How can we function without it? Can we?

The government, through their primary readiness website ready.gov has resources a-plenty, but really, how many of us are ready for any of it? At work we have fire drills and tornado-readiness drills, but what about other sorts of disasters? What about infrastructure failure drills? What do we do when we have to span a day at work without some fundamental service, such as electricity, information services, fuel, or water? That’s what has captured my attention currently.

Getting back to the topic of infrastructure, if there is failure, do the systems we have have enough robust redundancy to cope with failure and can we quickly recover function from the gaping maw of failure if it should strike? It’s clear and present, when it comes to water supply that we may be running too close to just-in-time delivery for comforts sake? What about having a large container of potable water in a gravity-fed system just in case we need it? There rarely is such a thing because the system has rarely failed and we don’t feel the need for the extra design or cost. Just because something has rarely failed does not necessarily mean it is proofed against failure.

So when will the water go out? Nobody knows. Maybe at 9, but it’s still running so I doubt that. What is our plan to cope with this loss of one part of the infrastructure? We don’t have one. We don’t need one, or do we? Nobody is really clear and instead of asking, we’re just sitting around warily looking at the sinks and wondering if it will work, and if it doesn’t, where are we going to go when we need to use the bathrooms? Good questions, all.

The Hazards of Equality

There is a problem with the world. Lack of Equality. In many places I see it, from thoughts raised by friends and coworkers mostly raising the topic of gay marriage is the classic entryway to begin a dialogue regarding equality, to outright questions about what I think about the entire issue.

I believe in human equality.

It’s not a country thing, it’s not a state thing, it’s a species thing. What makes me different from my female peers who earn less than I do because of their gender? What makes my relationship with my partner different than my straight peers relationships?  Why can they apply for a marriage contract while I cannot? Is it a matter of dedication and monogamy? Both my partner and I have been building a life for 13 years, we’ve outlasted many marriages just based on our togetherness. I think it’s a power thing.

Those who have power, or any of it’s analogues, such as rights, control, ability, or benefits obviously understand that being special, being gifted, having power is far better than being downtrodden and left without power, or even worse, having power taken away from you. Those that have power in our culture are determined to maintain their grip on such power for as long as they can. There is a central question that they cannot rationally answer – “What is it to you?” when posed with the concept of homosexual union. These people aren’t really interested in what is right or wrong, they are simply greedy for power. This greed blinds them and makes them hypocrites, and they earn my pity.

It is true that I cannot marry my partner of 13 years, at least here in Michigan and I accept that. There are a majority of people in my state who do not like all of me, just the part of me that works and pays taxes in a timely fashion. To offer someone like me equality requires that they relinquish some power. This is the core stumbling block to the progress of equality in our culture. Those that have power wish to retain it and deny others access. When you realize this, you stop feeling so put upon by others and discover that they are the simplest of monsters, greedy trolls collecting their tolls and regarding their squalor under the bridge as kingdoms of infinite space.

It then falls to other routes for my kind to tear power out of the hands of the greedy trolls. We approach the courts for a redress of grievances, citing phrases such as “All men are created equal” and “Equal protection under the law” and then the response is “Activist Judges”. We try popular appeal via referenda and end up in the same place by the opposition, wether it be lawsuits to stop us or Governors devoted to veto our rights each time they come up. This isn’t a war that will be won with one single decisive battle, this is guerilla attrition. We win by endurance.

Endurance. We outlive the elements in our culture, the trolls, that spend an inordinate time having serious problems with my kind and apparently have answers for “What is it to you?” when it comes to letting my kind marry. The solution is to simply outlive the pigheaded. The children of today will eventually grow up in a world more equal, and they’ll be more accepting. It won’t happen for about 20 years, it won’t really have any forward momentum until the Baby Boomers begin to die. When the young rush in to replace them in the voting booths, then we’ll see a reduction in bullshit and people shaking their heads when asked “What is it to you?”

This is all very well and good, but Equality just for homosexuals is one aspect of the larger societal problem. Real equality would help all the treaded-upon, not just the gays – but also gender inequality, race inequality, and even citizen’ly inequality. Women should earn the same as men, for example. It’s not just our group we should be fighting for, but for everyone who finds themselves on the short end of the stick when it comes to power.

Funny that the spirit of a lot of what we all seek is already in the founding texts of our great country. It’s just going to take some generational turnover before everyone gets to be equal.