Network Monitoring

Posted on December 14, 2015 by bluedepth

I’m in the middle of a rather protracted evaluation of network infrastructure monitoring software. I’ve started looking at Paessler’s PRTG, also SolarWinds Orion product and in January I’ll be looking at Ipswitch’s products.

I also started looking at Nagios and Cacti. That’s where the fun-house mirrors start. The first big hurdle is no cost vs. cost. The commercial products mentioned before are rather pricey while Nagios and Cacti are GPL, and open sourced, principally available for no cost.

With PRTG, it was an engaging evaluation however I ran into one of the first catch-22’s with network monitoring software, that Symantec Endpoint Protection considers network scanning to be provocative, and so the uneducated SEP client blocks the poller because it believes it to be a network scanner. I ran into a bit of a headache with PRTG as the web client didn’t register changes as I expected. One of the things that I have come to understand about the cost-model network products is that each one of them appears to have a custom approach to licensing. Each company approaches it differently. PRTG is based on individual sensor, Orion is based on buckets, and I can’t readily recall Ipswitches design, but I think it was based on nodes.

Many of these products seem to throw darts at the wall when it comes to their products, sometimes hit and sometimes miss. PRTG was okay, it created a bumper crop of useless alarms, Solarwinds Orion has an exceptionally annoying network discovery routine, and I haven’t uncorked Ipswitch’s product yet.

I don’t know if I want to pay for this sort of product. Also, it seems that this is one of those arrangements that if I bite on a particular product, I’ll be on a per-year budget cost treadmill for as long as I use the product unless I try the no-cost options.

This project may launch a new blog series, or not, depending on how things turn out. Looking online didn’t pan out very much. There is somewhat of a religious holy war surrounding these products. Some people champion the GPL products; other people push the solution they went with when they first decided on a product. It’s funny but now that I care about the network, I’m coming to the party rather late. At least, I don’t have to worry about the hot slag of “alpha revision software” and much of the provider space seems quite mature.

I really would like anyone who works in the IT industry to please comment with your thoughts and feelings about this category if you have any recommendations or experiences. I’m keenly aware of what I call “show-stopper” issues.

Trials

Posted on December 12, 2015 by bluedepth

A major Fortune 500 company has a world-renowned hiring trial for their new IT staff. There are all the usuals, the resumes, the interviews, but there is also a fully funded practical trial as part of the job application process. The job itself is cherry, practically autonomous, with real challenges and true financial backing so the winner can dig in and achieve serious results.

The trial is rather straightforward, given a property address, you must approach, perform an intake procedure to discover what is required and then plan and execute whatever is needed to solve the IT need.

The property has one person, a newly hired young woman who is sitting at a central desk on the ground floor. She has a folder, within it, a script that she reads to each candidate:

“Welcome to your trial, this building has everything required to run a branch of our company. Every computer, networking component, and server component is placed and wired properly. Your task is to configure all the equipment throughout the branch properly. You will find all the resources you need to complete this task within the building. You have one week to complete this task. Good Luck.”

The young woman then folds her hands together and waits.

Several candidates engage with the trial, hoping to get the cherry job and have learned about the young lady at the reception desk. They pass all the requirements, and they eagerly arrive to try their hand at the trial. They impatiently sit through her canned speech and quickly head off to the basement to start in the server room.

Candidates come and go, some pass and some fail. The trial is to get the branch fully operational and on the last day of the week the branch becomes staffed, and the candidate must ensure that all the preparations are in place and that everyone can work without a technological failure. The trial is winnable but very arduous.

The young lady sitting at the central desk on the ground floor has a secret. She has a shoebox locked in a drawer attached to her desk and around her neck is a key on a golden necklace. She has specific instructions, which if a candidate approaches her and engages pleasantly and shows sincere interest in her role in the branch without being the destination of a last-ditch effort, she is to pause the conversation, unlock the desk and produce the shoebox to the candidate. Within the shoebox is the answer to the trial, it is every specific requirement written in clear, actionable text with a memory stick containing every proper configuration and a full procedure list that will bring the branch to full operation without a single hiccup. Everything from networking configurations to the copier codes for the janitorial staff is covered and once executed virtually guarantees a win.

How many people would simply ignore the receptionist and get cracking on the trial and how many would take their time to get to know everyone and their roles in that particular branch? Either kind of candidate can win, either through a sheer act of will or simply being kind, careful, and honestly interested in the welfare of each of their coworkers. Nobody knows about the secret key, but sometimes the answer you need comes from a place you would never expect.

Peer to Peer File Transfer, Reep.io

Posted on December 8, 2015 by bluedepth

I recently needed to move about ten gigabytes of data from me to a friend and we used a new website service called reep.io. It’s quite a neat solution. It relies on a technology that has exists in many modern browsers, like Chrome, Firefox, and Opera called WebRTC.

The usual way to move such a large set of data from one place to another would probably best be mailing a USB memory stick or waiting to get together and then just sneaker-net the files from one place to another. The issue with a lot of online services that enable people to transfer files like this is that many of them are limited. Most of the online offerings cap out at around two gigabytes and then ask you to register either for a paid or free account to transfer more data. Services like Dropbox exist, but you need the storage space to create that public link to hand to your friend so they can download the data, plus it occupies the limited space in your Dropbox. With reep.io, there is no middleman. There are no limits. It’s browser to browser and secured by TLS. Is that a good thing? It’s better than nothing. The reason I don’t like any of the other services, even the free-to-use-please-register sites is because there is always this middleman irritation in the way, it’s inconvenient. Always having to be careful not to blow the limit on the transfer, or if it’s a large transfer like ten gigabytes, chopping up the data into whatever bite-sized chunk the service arbitrarily demands is very annoying.

To use this site, it’s dead simple. Visit reep.io, and then either click and drag the file you want to share or click on the File Add icon area to bring up a file open dialog box and find the file you want to share. Once set, the site generates a link that you can then send to anyone you wish to engage with a peer-to-peer file exchange. As long as you leave your browser running, the exchange will always work with that particular link. You don’t need any extra applications, and it works across platforms, so a Windows peer can send a file to a Mac client, for example. That there is no size limit is a huge value right there.

If you have a folder you want to share, you can ZIP it up and share that file. It’s easy to use, and because there are no middlemen, there aren’t any accounts to create, and thanks to TLS, nobody peeping over your shoulder.

Weak Certificates

Posted on November 11, 2015 by bluedepth

I’ve got an odd little problem at work. I’ve got a Ricoh copier in the Traverse City office that I apparently now can no longer manage remotely due to an error in SSL. The error that Firefox throws is ssl_error_weak_server_cert_key and in Google Chrome it’s ERR_SSL_WEAK_SERVER_EPHEMERAL_DH_KEY. In both situations I understand what the issue is, that the SSL layer is weak because the Diffie-Hellman key is not big enough.

I’ve run into this issue before, mostly with self-signed certs and the browsers have usually allowed me to click on an exception and get on with my day. Except for Firefox and Chrome now, that is no longer the case. The browsers just refuse to display the webpage. I understand the logic behind it, everyone wants a more secure web, but sometimes what we are really after isn’t privacy or security, but rather just getting our work done.

I still need to connect to this copier and manage it, and frankly my dear, I don’t really care that much that the transactions be secure. In a way, this security is irrelevant. The traffic on our WAN is flowing over a Meraki VPN site-to-site link, so it’s already secure. This is security on top of security, and it’s in the way.

So I thought about using the awful Internet Explorer for this and I chafe at even considering using one more wretched bit of Microsoft technology – there has to be a better solution. So when you run into little bits like this the best way forward is to pursue my favorite solution, heterogenous computing! There’s more than one way to get what you are after. So if Firefox and Chrome won’t work, and Internet Explorer is unthinkable, how about Opera?

So I downloaded Opera and installed it. Then browsed to my copier in Traverse City. Opera told me about the error, but it also provided me with an exception button and then once I clicked that, the error was bypassed and my copiers remote management screen appeared.

So now I’ll add Opera to all the other browsers I have on my computers. The answer is competition. I wonder sometimes if there isn’t a special browser out there for IT type people like me. They’ll render anything, ignore any “privacy or security” type errors, all so people like me can get our jobs done. For now, Opera seems to lead the pack, at least for this. Thank you Opera!

Better Credit Card Security

Posted on March 17, 2015 by bluedepth

While talking with a friend, who is enduring some unpleasantness the conversation turned to issues with using credit cards to buy things, like food for example. That got me thinking, how would I design a really strong way to prevent data breaches?

Encrypt everything!

Well, perhaps not that, but hash everything. Here’s what I talked myself into, of course none of this is rational because nobody will effect a planetwide shift in payment processing based on what this yokel has to say, but still, here goes.

Issuing Bank sets up credit account, there are four key fields that are important for the classic transaction, name, number, expiration date, and CVV2. I think one could also establish a timebased one-time-password secret as well, it would operate like Google Authenticator functions. So you’d need a secret that the bank generated for their systems and the physical card too. You’d need a smart chip on the card so it could forward the TOTP code to the credit terminal at the point of sale.

The bank sets up a TOTP secret, so it’s named JQP Credit Card (or account number or whatever) and the secret is: 6B57078FB88A4DD73E447D2647DCEC7D04C3D887951BA6A2D8DBA294E0B60579. This number is forwarded to the credit card terminal. Right now it’s 726995, but in thirty seconds it’ll be something else. Since the credit card terminal and the bank share sync’ed time via time.nist.gov, there is no risk that there would be some sort of mismatch between the two.

The customer goes to the credit card terminal and swipes, a value is entered and a timestamp is recorded, all of this is already parts of a credit transaction. The terminal can read the name, expiration, CVV2, whatever from the magnetic stripe and the smart chip forwards the TOTP code, then the terminal assembles this into a EDI transaction:

JOHN/Q/PUBLIC#1111222233334444#1015#170#726995 and applies SHA256 to it, to create:

621d3dd5a66277a7ab3737f306728e3c4bc5f3cd20c8730c37cc61c6575de0ba

This is stored in a database and then forwarded to the bank with the timestamp, so it’ll look like this:

987654321#621d3dd5a66277a7ab3737f306728e3c4bc5f3cd20c8730c37cc61c6575de0ba#15.09#1426615839

So the bank will be presented with a Customer ID, SHA-256, they’ll have the total dollar amount, and they’ll have Epoch time, or the number of seconds from 00:00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970. This could be easily done by a Linux kernel by the output of date -j -f “%a %b %d %T %Z %Y” “date” “+%s”

The bank would then have everything they need, they’d have the secret key, which with the Epoch time from the transaction would give them the TOTP calculation, which would generate the answer 726995. Then they’d have the card details from the customer ID, the SHA-256, and the amount. They could then calculate the hash on their own:

621d3dd5a66277a7ab3737f306728e3c4bc5f3cd20c8730c37cc61c6575de0ba

And authorize the transaction.

Even if the card details were stolen by someone copying the numbers off the card, they wouldn’t get the TOTP secret. Plus the TOTP secret is changing every 30 seconds. If someone tried to run this transaction and guessed at the TOTP code, they’d generate this:
987654321#a1b714fba988632200c78a5b9021bca5b48f149b036aa901c03173f0f2de5399#15.09#14266158 and the bank would instantly detect this incorrect SHA hash and cancel the card and ship a new one.

This is rather involved but the practical upshot is, if a vendor kept these transactions in a database and someone stole the database to use for their own nefarious needs, the presence of the TOTP and SHA-256 would make the data in the database worthless because the TOTP has no predictable pattern if you don’t know the secret, and SHA-256 is very sensitive to even the smallest change in the input data that it’s hashing. This would free vendors, banks, and customers from risking PII leakage or identity theft.

I’ve also thought that this would be a great way to secure SSN’s as well for use with the government, they know your SSN and you know your SSN, so when communicating over a possibly compromised channel you can authenticate not with your SSN, but with the hash of your SSN.

John Q. Public, 123-45-6789 -> 01a54629efb952287e554eb23ef69c52097a75aecc0e3a93ca0855ab6d7a31a0

Prep Porn

Posted on February 27, 2015 by bluedepth

I’ve found myself taking little diversions into geek town. There’s always been this pervasive suspicion that privacy is dead, but since Edward Snowden came out and said, “Yes, everything you feared is real and it’s much worse than you know and far worse than you could ever imagine.” That statement only added fuel to the fire for me.

How did I spend my spare time? Exploring digital security measures. After a while I started to sense that I was very much on my own, the technology of privacy is a desert. I accepted that I would never likely be able to put all of this into actual practice, so it became a kind of exploration into digital privacy for the geek thrill of finding something new and watching it work. Kind of like getting a complex rube-goldberg machine and using it just to watch it clink and clank away.

Diving into privacy has had some remarkable side-effects. It is very easy to quickly slide into paranoia. The idea that everyone is out for what you know and what you are talking about, measuring you and evaluating the things you communicate and the data you create and store. Honestly speaking, that’s a mirage — it only seems that way because you have new toys to make it all super secure, so in a way, creating super secure methods invites the notion that Eve is out to get you. Who is Eve? In crypto circles whenever people want to discuss how a crypto system works, they need names to give people to humanize the interaction and make it more relevant for people. Alice is always the initiator of the secret communications, Bob is always her recipient or contact, and Eve (which I have always mused stands for “Eavesdropper” sits in between Alice and Bob wanting their secrets and breaking through their veil of privacy.

I started with PKI, Public Key Infrastructure. It’s a fully fleshed out system which uses a pair of keys to secure anything digital, from files, to text, to even entire telephone conversations. This system has two parts, a Public Key and a Private Key. When you create your key, and key generation is actually laughably trivial, you keep your Private Key held close to your bosom and you send your Public Key to everyone you know who is using PKI. They tried to address this by creating things called Keyservers. These are systems that are run by various places that you can post your Public Key to and they’ll keep it in their database. You and anyone else can use these services to look up others and get their Public Keys. These Public Keys have fingerprints, so you can verify that the keys aren’t mangled, damaged, or shanghai’ed by some nefarious other party (Eve). So, Alice would seek out Bob’s Public Key and cast her message using the key to encrypt it. Once that’s done, the data is complete gobbledegook to everything in the Universe except Bob’s Private Key. Bob gets the message, because he has his Private Key, he can decode the message and benefit from it’s contents. Eve could of course get her hands on the secure message herself by wiretap or eavesdropping, but the message will only unlock to a very specific Private Key, so without it, Eve just has so much noise. Alas, this system only works when everyone is using the infrastructure. Everyone needs to have a keypair, otherwise there is no way to address your message, because there is an absolute lack of Public Keys to be had for anyone! And this is my headache. Even if I wanted to use PKI, it’s worthless because nobody I want to communicate with has a Public Key. This PKI, this one thing, is currently one of a handful of things that Eve cannot actually break into. And when I say Eve, I really mean the nebulous fog of the Men In Black, so the FBI, the NSA, GCHQ, those types. They are always in black suits and black sunglasses and we hope they are nice and mean us no harm, ahem, sure.

If PKI won’t work, which boggles my mind since it costs nothing at all to actually use any part of it, the next step is exploring conventional cryptography. There are algorithms that go by codenames that everyone can use. There are two different realms for these sorts of tools. There are the trade names of the tools like Rigndael, Serpent, Twofish, Blowfish, Threefish, and so on. These are the mechanical parts that make conventional cryptography possible. Alice and Bob have a secret only they know, a nice long password. They can use these tools to make their sensitive data useless for anyone who doesn’t have their password. It’s somewhat like PKI, only that both Alice and Bob need to share that secret ahead of time for any of this to work. These tools are all submitted to the government for their consideration and when a tool is submitted and chosen, like Rigndael it loses it’s authors name and picks up a big impressive name from the government, in this case AES. Advanced Encryption Standard. As a curious sidelight, Serpent was a competitor for AES with Rigndael, one won, the other did not. All of these tools have a number associated with them, these are the key length measurements and in a general way can be equated with the strength of the encryption. AES-128 is “weaker” than AES-256. These numbers indicate the number of bits used to form the secret key used in the encryption. The longer the key, the harder it is to attack the encrypted message with brute force attacking it. Having the message is easy, guessing every possible key combination when there are 256 bits in play? That’s a huge keyspace! A keyspace is an imaginary construct that tries to tie physical size to the sheer number of combinations that a key can have. A key with one bit has only two possible values, either zero or one, so it’s keyspace is 2^1, or two. If it isn’t zero, it’s one. The keyspace for AES-256? It’s 2^256, or 1 with 77 zeroes after it. That’s an insanely huge keyspace, so the idea of being able to brute force it is laughably meaningless. It’s worthless to try. The nice thing about these tools is they can be used solitarily. Yes, you could use them to share secrets with other people, but a more useful approach is to use these tools to keep your data secure while it’s stored somewhere. If you don’t have that somewhere always under your conscious control, you really need these tools to make sure it’s secure from Eve and her minions. This starts an arms race of a sort. The tools themselves compete along with their key lengths, and cryptologists, fueled by paranoia perhaps are always trying to come up with clever ways to break these tools. To prove the strength of your tools, you push them until they break, then you know what kind of pressure they can withstand. Where we are now, AES-256 is considered secure, even against Eve, but that is eroding with time. Why? It comes down to that keyspace I mentioned earlier. There is another batch of tools called hashers, they convert something into something else and that conversion is one way only. You can hash a phrase “This is a secret” using a hash and it spits out a long strip of character data. These hashers can be used to turn your password into a key that the tools use to make your data secure. Currently we have much like the encryption tools, a series of named tools from their creators and the government’s renamed tools. What used to be MD5 became SHA-1, SHA standing for “Secure Hashing Algorithm”. The problem is that hashes can sometimes collide. If you put in “something A” and get a hash, the only way you can feel truly safe is if there is nothing else that works to create that result. A collision is when something else also works. When the hash of “something A” and “something B” are the same is a collision. When you have a hash that is a victim of collisions, the keyspace that hash can help you create is decimated. Much like a burning barn, whenever there is talk of a detected collision, people flee the old tools because they broke. Eve and her minions are onto us! This is why SHA-0 was abandoned for SHA-1, and that was abandoned for SHA-2, and now Keccak was chosen for SHA-3, that’s where we are now.

The paranoia doesn’t stop with Alice, Bob, and Eve. The paranoia snakes its way into the government. Ever since Edward Snowden shared his Pandoras Box with us all, the arbiter of national standards, NIST, is now just as suspect as Eve and her minions are. NIST is the organization that adopts tools into their formal-sounding government rebranded tool names. Rigndael became AES through NIST. Do we really trust AES? NIST has their hands in it, and we don’t trust NIST, so… thankfully when these competitions are held for the vaunted position of NIST winner, the other competitors don’t simply disappear. This led me from AES to Serpent, which was not selected by NIST. Honestly I think AES-256 is still trustworthy, but there is a part of me that prefers Serpent-256 more.

These algorithms are all eventually going to break. Every tool has it’s breaking point. Even Serpent-256 will eventually fail when some clever person figures out an attack that works against it. There is only one algorithm in the entire Universe that is perfect and cannot possibly fail, and that is the one time pad. Cryptology started there and oddly enough created its pinnacle first. The requirements for the one time pad are really steep and its incredibly inconvenient to use. The first thing is to create the pad, and you need a truly random key. If the key has some pattern or design to it, your key can be derived later and it’s worthless. Also, you need enough key-meat to cover your entire message – and if your message is big, you need a lot of key-meat. Plus with big keys there is another problem, how to share that sucker! The key for the one time pad is everything, so you have to do it person to person and you have to make sure that the key doesn’t leak out or get stolen. That’s the danger of the one time pad, the key is a thing not a calculation. What makes it immune from attack opens it up for theft. If you are certain that your key is safe and sound and truly random then the data you encode with the key will adopt the randomness from the underlying key and be impossible to attack using any method, cleverness or brute force. My explorations took me down the path of the one time pad, but it only works to secure data solitarily, sharing data? You need to have the key in multiple places and you can’t be in two places at the same time to make sure that the key is always secure, and you can’t stay awake and vigilant to ensure it either. So what is perfect is ironically total crap. In the end, you are back to the algorithms themselves and until someone can fix the problems with the one time pad, we’re always going to be in an arms race over the strength of our toolkits.

After all this data security geeking that I got myself wound up with I started to branch out and looked into places where cryptography intersects other parts of life. One of the most compelling and frustrating places where this is occurring is cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin was invented by Satoshi Nakamoto. Who is Satoshi? Nobody knows. He may be real or he may be a group of people or he may be an alias. What he created though is amazing. Bitcoin is a currency, you can use it like money, store value, transmit it, and it appears to have all the conditions to be equivalent to fiat, which is a codeword for “cash”. The US Dollar is fiat, Bitcoin is not fiat. Bitcoin is not like the US Dollar, it isn’t based on faith but rather on mathematics. The US Dollar used to be linked to gold, called the gold standard. For every dollar that was in existence it was tied to so much physical gold that you could in theory exchange whenever you wanted to do so. In October 1976 the US Government abandoned the gold standard and US Dollars were then simply an instrument of faith that the US Government was “worth it”. It also helped that everyone here uses the dollar for everything, so it’s natural to use it and not think too hard about what value lies behind it – because the only thing behind it is a big group of old white men smiling and staring at you.

The way Bitcoin works is both involved and really quite elegant. There is a central record of all transactions that have occurred since the currency was invented and that public ledger is called the blockchain. It is a list of transactions in blocks and those blocks are in a way, chained together. As people use Bitcoin, they create new lines in the ledger and share that with every Bitcoin node. A node is the full Bitcoin client, it’s run by anyone and everyone, you can run one too. What keeps the blockchain authentic and honest lies in its ubiquity. It’s in copies worldwide on hundreds of thousands of machines. It transcends national borders, gender, race, creed, orientation, and economic class. Because there are so many perfect identical copies, any “wrong” copy, made that way by trying to be clever gets rejected. As people use Bitcoin, the transactions pile up in the blockchain, and it’s the job of Bitcoin miners to calculate hashes of all the transactions, a feat that is made hard-to-accomplish so as to create a valuable proof-of-work. The Bitcoin miners have to sweat it out to get their reward. When a miner succeeds in adding a new block of transactions to the blockchain they get a reward of 25 bitcoins. This is how the currency injects new “bitcoin matter” into the trading space. Miners secure and codify the blockchain, the blockchain rewards them with value and the miners then use that value in the marketplace. Over time this reward will be halved, so it’ll be 12.5 bitcoins, and then after a time this will be halved again until all the Bitcoins that will be created through mining are expressed into the marketplace by miners. Bitcoin will have this mining subsidy in place up until 2140, but by that time the protocol may change, so it might end then or it may never end. Another thread of value for miners is the transaction fee. When you issue a payment in terms of bitcoin you pay what you owe plus a customary transaction fee payment as well. This fee is 0.1 millibits or roughly 3¢ USD. This transaction fee is a static fee no matter how big the bitcoin transaction is.

Using bitcoin itself can be a little bit daunting, because the public address for bitcoin is a rather ugly long string of characters, such as this one, which is one of mine: 1KxM4U6Q5hYdfi9aSEeS7vj9cBZyrnADJJ. Typing this in manually is an epic pain in the ass, however there is another technology that already exists called QR codes. These graphical representations can represent these long strings of characters in a single easily printable symbol:

Bitcoin is formed much like PKI conducts business, there are Public Keys and Private Keys. The code above is a Public Key address for a Bitcoin account. This address can hold value, it can receive value and I can look up its value in the blockchain and see how much value is there expressed in Bitcoin. If I want to move the value somewhere else or use the value stored there for any purpose, I need that codes companion Private Key. When you have a software wallet, one of its core features is the creation of these accounts. They are free and easy, as they are calculated from the pseudorandom number generator in all contemporary computers. The core of a Bitcoin account is based singly on the Private Key. That is created first using pseudorandom sources and then the Public Key is calculated from the Private Key, it’s a hash, so you can’t reverse the Public Key and derive the Private Key. Modern smartphones are where Bitcoin really shines, iPhone or Android devices have apps that can manage these wallet codes, both Public Keys and Private Keys, so they operate just like a real wallet. You can get money using them and you can pay using them too. It’s in the QR code that makes the transactions simple. Your device takes a picture of the QR and decodes it and then acts on that data. You don’t need to (but you could) hammer out the Public Key address to make everything work the way you expect it to.

I spent a while exploring Bitcoin, and playing with various wallets. There are online wallets, there are device-based wallets, and there are paper wallets. The online sites are a crapshoot, some of them work okay, and others are bitcoin roach motels. I don’t like the hosted online wallets, they are just too fragile and sketchy for my tastes. On device wallets are really quite good, iOS more than Android only because iOS is a really well secured platform. You can also download the client for Bitcoin, the reference client and download a copy of the entire blockchain and use that to record bitcoin transactions if you like, but the blockchain was about 20GB the last I saw it, and that was too big for a machine like my Macbook Pro to store. Some wallets that are for computers use a variant of transaction confirmation called SPV, which depends on a reliable string of confirmations to ensure that the current shape of the blockchain is correct. The nice thing about SPV wallets, or thin wallets as they are called in comparison to the fat wallets of the reference client of Bitcoin is that the sheer size of the blockchain doesn’t need to be stored locally, it scales better with less storage space required. Even these computer-based wallets have their vulnerabilities and that’s why there are paper wallets. Paper wallets have their Private Key printed out as a QR code and hidden behind folded paper, with the Public Key publicly visible. These paper based wallets are really convenient for storing the value of bitcoins off of computer equipment. The value itself is still in the blockchain, in the ledger itself, but the security of the Private Key is now just on a slip of paper. If the paper is destroyed, the Private Key is lost forever and the value associated with it is lost. The value is still in the blockchain, but since nobody can get at it, the Public Keys can’t be converted into Private Keys, the value is completely inaccessible, and really lost forever. As I explored paper wallets I also got to thinking about one of the core assumptions of a lot of hosted and online wallet systems. They all depend on pseudorandom data to forge the Private Key. These generators create random-looking data but there is always a slim chance that someone could figure out the way the numbers were created and make the pseudorandom deterministic. If you could do that, you could simply replay how the pseudorandom generator did its work and replay out the supposedly random Private Key and then your security is down the toilet. All the value associated with that Private Key is vulnerable and your money could just evaporate, poof. Bitcoin Private Keys are forged from 32 bytes of random data. That key length is familiar, I’ve spoken about it before. 32 bytes with 8 bits per byte is a Private Key composed of 256 bits. That’s 2^256, a keyspace that (like we saw before) is 1 with 77 zeroes after it. So I started to think about ways to create truly random bytes to use in my own paper wallets, I wanted it to be pure from the get go. If I could accept an online answer, there are many sources including one of my favorites, which is Hotbits (which creates randomness from radioactive decay). What I wanted was a somewhat convenient way to create my own random bytes without having to use a computer at all. I discovered Hexidice online from a gaming store. These dice have sixteen values on them, 0-9 and A-F. One die is 1 nibble, or half a byte. That means that two dice are 1 byte, and 8 dice are 4 bytes. If I throw eight dice eight times that creates 64 nibbles or 32 bytes. I could technically do the mathematics myself to convert this pure random Private Key into a valid Public Key, but for that part I’m actually okay with using an offline copy of Bitcoinpaperwallet.com on my Macbook Pro. I just turn off the Wifi, start the offline copy of the site and type in my forged Private Key, the system then helps me calculate the Public Key and then make a very attractive paper-based wallet with fold lines and neat graphics and everything. When I want to add value to the paper wallet all I need to do is scan the QR code printed on the front as the Public Key and I can add money to that in a snap. If I want to use the money or move it somewhere else, I need to unfold my wallet and add it to my phone temporarily. That actually is a bad thing, because it would then technically expose my previously Private Key to the world through my phone. If I wanted to be really careful I would prepare a new paper wallet, then use the old one, buy something with it and the remaining value would then need to be immediately sent to the Public Key on my new paper wallet. Then the old paper wallet could be burned.

Once I figured out the storage mechanisms for Bitcoin I got to thinking about how to exchange fiat currency for Bitcoin. There are two distinct ways to go about this with some blurry spots in-between. The one way is to use a regulated exchange, these companies allow you to buy Bitcoin by opening up access to your bank account or debit card and prove your identity to the exchange. The other way is through Localbitcoins which connects you to people who are willing to exchange fiat for bitcoin over-the-counter using cash. The first way is okay, but it irks me because you have to reveal your identity in order to move forward. The second way is more secure and anonymous, but you have to put up with people who may or may not be trustworthy. They may make off with your cash and not give you any bitcoin, it’s a risk. The blurry spots in between? Those companies operate somewhat like the regulated exchanges except they depend on the US Postal Service to be the money mule. You buy a postal money order for the bitcoin you want, mail it to the exchange, and they transfer the bitcoins that you purchased to the Public Key you provided them.

Once you get fiat exchanged into bitcoin you can buy things with bitcoin. Shops could accept bitcoin by simply downloading a Bitcoin wallet and creating a Public Key, making it visible to customers and payment would be the capture of a QR code and the speed of the blockchain makes payment verification easy within 10-15 seconds of the initiation of the payment cycle. Bitcoin can also be used to move value from one place to another instantly without having to endure regulations or custom controls. If you are in a foreign country and need money, you could use bitcoin as a money mule. There are so many ways bitcoin could be used, the applications are just as many as exist with fiat currency.

All these explorations with bitcoin were occupying my spare time and I got a chance to read more of what Edward Snowden had to say. In one message he expressed interest and promise in a program called BitMessage. So of course, I went looking. BitMessage is structured a lot like Bitcoin, except instead of money the “currency” is messages. You can download the BitMessage client for free and start using it. With the BitMessage client, you can create a BitMessage address – such as BM-2cWAk99gBxdAQAKYQGC5Gbskon21GdT29X. If you had BitMessage and sent me a message with this address, I would get it. The neat part about this system is that it encrypts the message and the identity of those in the conversation. This is done very much the same way it is with bitcoins blockchain. Alice posts a message for Bob, it’s encrypted and then sent to everyone, sent to BitMessages “blockchain”. Bob can see this data store and because he has the Private Key that is associated with the BitMessage Public Key that Alice used to send him a message he can actually decrypt this section of the Bitmessage “blockchain” and read it. The message itself cannot be traced to where it comes from or where it goes off to, it shifts that sense around. Everyone has copies of all the encrypted traffic on the system, and only those with the proper private keys can read the appropriate parts and communicate securely. Bitmessage is neat because it bakes PKI into one simple program. As I started to fiddle around with Bitmessage I thought that adding PKI on top of Bitmessage could prove useful as an added layer of security. The only thing you have to watch out for with standard PKI is that the key generation process really wants you to put in a true reliable email. You don’t have to if you don’t want, you can create a keypair without an email, in that case you could be nobody@noemail.com, if you like.

I started to think about the practical applications of Bitmessage and PKI. If you had to get some super-secure message out of one place and you were paranoid about privacy you could go to a website on TOR and get your contacts Public Key and anonymous Bitmessage address, use the Public Key to encode your message, open up Bitmessage and post the information to the BM address and send it knowing that your transmission and their reception could not be tracked and the contents of the message could only be opened by the person with the right Private Key.

What then for all of this? Nobody using PKI, no locals using Bitcoin and no shops accepting it, and nobody but curious lookeyloos using BitMessage? At least I’ll be prepared for Eve and her minions. If you would like to regain some of your own privacy, just let me know and I would be very happy to help you navigate the technology and see how neat all these tools are to use.

Geek Excursions: BitMessage

Posted on January 15, 2015 by bluedepth

Along with my curiosity surrounding Bitcoin, there is a similar technology that has been released for public use called BitMessage. This system is a really neat way to securely communicate in a secure method that involves absolutely no trust whatsoever. It’s a completely decentralized email infrastructure and has captured a lot of my spare attention. BitMessage works a lot like how Bitcoin does, you can create email addresses on the fly, they are a long sequence of random characters that your system can display because you have both a public key and a private key. In a lot of ways BitMessage deals with the biggest problem surrounding PGP/GPG, which is key management. Nobody really wants to manage keys or use the system because it’s extra work. Plus even with PGP/GPG, your identity is written on your keys for everyone to see.

Getting started with BitMessage is a snap. First you need to download the BitMessage client, and you can get that at bitmessage.org. There’s a Windows and Mac client available, you can start it and be instantly attached to the BitMessage network, ready to create new “BitMessage Addresses” and throw them away just as easily. So, for example, you could reach me by sending me a BitMessage to this address: BM-2cWAk99gBxdAQAKYQGC5Gbskon21GdT29X. When you send a message using BitMessage, its to this address and from an address that your client makes, so the conversation occurs securely and since every node has a copy of the data it’s impossible to tell who is getting what information. I think an even more secure method would be to cross BitMessage with a PGP/GPG key. The only problem with a key like that is that classically PGP/GPG keys require that you include your email address as a subkey so that you can be identified by a human-readable email address when looking for your public key or when someone else is looking for it, to verify a signature for example. The PGP/GPG system doesn’t require an email address, you can of course create a public and private keypair using PGP/GPG and make the email address up from whole cloth, and instead just let people know the key ID that you want them to use. So technically if Alice wanted to secretly communicate with me, we could give each other our public keys to start and then use BitMessage as the messaging mule. I don’t see how any eavesdropper could make sense out of any of that data flow. It’s unclear what the contents are, the PGP/GPG encryption keeps the contents of the message secure, and BitMessage itself seriously obfuscates if not outright eliminates being able to tell where the messages are ultimately going to or coming from.

I have to admit that BitMessage is very user friendly and very handy to have. My only issue with it is that I don’t know anyone who uses it, but perhaps this blog post will change that. If you are interested in this bleeding-edge crypto/privacy software, I encourage you to chat me up on BitMessage for serious matters or for fun.

Apple Watch

Posted on September 21, 2014 by bluedepth

On September 9th, 2014 Apple unveiled their iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, Apple Pay and Apple Watch to the world. It was a really poorly kept secret that Apple was working on a wristwatch, so nobody was really surprised when Apple came out with their new designs. All we didn’t know what to what extent Apple was going to go with the technology.

They released more details on Apple Watch. The more I learned about the device the less I found myself thinking it was a good idea. There are so many places where this new watch is a problem.

Humans Have Limited Attention

We haven’t learned how to properly cope with the iPhone and now Apple is going to release an even more disruptive and attention-stealing device on the population. I’ve heard stories of crackdowns in Chicago where the police were pulling over people who were using their mobile devices while they should be driving their motor vehicles, and then learn that on the heels of the crackdown that the police recorded nearly everyone was breaking the law. Pulling over those people would have effectively shut down the entire highway! We just do not have the proper respect for all the technology in our lives, we cannot cope with these bright shiny attention-stealing devices while we are in command of an even larger device that requires our undivided attention at all times. So now Apple is going to put something even brighter and shinier on our wrists and we’re going to have what little attention that is left between our vehicles and our mobile devices divided again by this cleverness strapped to our wrists.

The tight integration between iPhones and Apple Watch will make our addictions to these devices even more challenging to master as well. Many people I know have a very hard time disconnecting from their devices anyways, now that there is an intimate extension of that device that we wear? I can only see this getting worse for those people who want others attention when we are all physically together. I’ve heard anecdotal stories where entire families sit in one room but nobody talks to anyone else because they are all besotted with their technology. What will this mean when the technology is always with us and on our wrists?

Haptics

The Apple Watch, a wearable device includes technology that includes haptics, or the sense of motion or vibration, both in the user interface with the light tap versus the deep press and the vibrating device buried deep into the watch itself. This will only worsen our abilities to control our attention and in itself is a place where we are going to have trouble. The watch can be paired to another watch and send heartbeats across the network, it’s Apple’s romantic notion of intimate communication. I can foresee a paired watch between a married couple and the husband feels his wifes pulse quicken, he worries that she’s having a stroke or a heart attack and rushes home to find a strange car in his driveway and a strange man in his bed. Cheating spouses is just the tip of the iceberg, this watch could be used to cheat in so many other places – cheat at the Casino with a complicated card-counting or odds-calculating routine piped into the players Apple Watch, or exam cheating by looking at the watch and seeing the letters for the answers appear as drawings on the Apple Watches screen.

How will these situations play out? For cheating spouses, there are the courts, so that’s rather a dull thing, but for the others I could see a new no-watch policy being extended to driving vehicles, entry into a casino, and standardized testing events like the SAT.

Nothing for the Sinister

The one thing that I noticed after discussing the Apple Watch with someone I know who is left-handed, that the device completely abandons functionality for the left-handed amongst us. It’s a hard choice Apple has made. Either you build a right-handed watch and a left-handed watch, or include handedness configurability in your design. It’s obvious after looking at the demo pieces that Apple has nothing set aside for the left-handed of us and have left a significant part of the population out in the cold. They could still use the device, but it will be much more awkward for them to actually use the device. I can see the detraction of non-handedness to be a compelling reason to not go ahead and purchase an Apple Watch.

Another Power Hungry Device

The Apple Watch is power hungry. It needs to charge nightly in order to continue to function. I find myself looking at the function of my wristwatch, a Seiko 5 Analog Automatic and immediately find what I have on the end of my arm, this watch, to be much more useful and compelling than this Apple Watch. My Seiko, if I care for it properly will never need winding as the mechanical automatic winder will never wear down or degrade or stop working. My motions feed the watch, and as long as I wear it every day, just living my life means that my watch will continue to count out seconds and sweep out the minutes and hours. My Seiko cannot do all the things that the Apple Watch can, but it can do the one thing a wristwatch should do very well and that is keep track of time. So far my Seiko has retained proper time for the few months I’ve had it. There is no technology in there that is synchronizing it to atomic time, and there is no need for that precision in my life. A watch that is bound to the power grid seems to be a risk to me, and since the most recent power outage, which for me was last night, the idea that my fancy Apple Watch could run down and just be a chunk of expensive metal and glass really concerns me.

Welcome to the Apple Silo, Penthouse Level

The Apple Watch creates an entire new floor to the Apple lifestyle silo. People are usually drawn in with a consumer device, like an iPod Nano or an iPhone, and then they are buying Macs and now the Apple Watch. I have to admit that Apple has a very good compelling company story, and they are leveraging this story magnificently well. They know that one Apple device usually turns into another, and before you know it you are knee-deep in the Apple Digital Lifestyle. The watch requires the iPhone to function, this is a very bold and possibly hazardous step for Apple to take. All the rest of their devices are independent devices, but this one, this Watch, is utterly dependent on an iPhone to function. I think this is the first fundamental break with the legacy of Steve Jobs and represents a really dangerous case for Apple. They are betting sales on pre-existing devices. That is either very ballsy or really stupid. This will only reinforce the cultural divide between people who flaunt this luxury versus people who do not. If you have an Apple Watch, then you necessarily have an iPhone. I can see this becoming a new and really upsetting hazard in big cities. Before it was a mystery what was plugged into a pair of headphones, it could have been anything from a cheap transistor radio, to a cassette Walkman to an iPod or iPhone. Now it’s really something quite different. If you see someone with an Apple Watch, you know that their iPhone isn’t far away. You are advertising that you have an iPhone to everyone who notices your watch. In small communities where theft and robbery isn’t a problem this won’t even show up on the map, but I foresee in bigger cities like Chicago and New York, that this will take on a new life all its own. A new spate of “Apple Watch” theft events. People getting mugged because of what they have on their wrists marks them out as being ripe for the plucking.

Price

The Apple Watch comes in three editions. There is the plain edition, the sports edition, and the luxury edition. The different editions put an embarrassing irony to the features that the phones are sold around, the replaceable wristbands most specifically. Why couldn’t it have just been one watch with different bands for different editions? Make the initial purchase for the core device and then let people swap out wristbands for the luxury components of the deal, if you want a canvas strap, a rubber one or a gold one, let those be options. Instead of that, there are three distinct Apple Watch varieties.

Then there is the price. $349 for the Apple Watch! In our society, what middle-class person would dangle such an expensive bit of technology on their wrists? Again I’m drawn back to my Seiko 5. The comparison of prices for what I need in a watch is all the reason enough to turn my back on the Apple Watch. My Seiko 5 cost me $70, that’s five times cheaper than the Apple Watch for a device that will never run out of power for as long as I don’t run out of power! It blew my mind, when I saw the price tag on the Apple Watch. I figured this could have been a jubilee celebration from Apple, they have billions of dollars buried in their company treasury, they could have made the Apple Watch a loss-leader for their iPhones, priced it at $70 and it would fly out the doors. Apple would lose money on each unit, but they’d make it up on the back side with all the cultural silo’ing that comes with using a device like an Apple Watch which necessitates an iPhone to go along with it.

Apple is betting that their Apple Watch will play as much as their iPads and iPhones did, selling millions of units. It may sell, and it very well may sell well, but I don’t think that $349 is worth this sort of technology. If it could do more, or if it was independent of the iPhone that might have helped, but it’s expensive, hazardous, and risky. I can’t see it really shining in sales numbers like the other devices did. Apple should have set it’s very lofty estimates for sales of the Apple Watch much lower. It’ll likely have the same sales numbers as the iPod Touch or iPod Nano.

I won’t be buying the Apple Watch. I have everything that I need already. The iPhone I have is enough, and my Seiko 5 does a magnificent job and you can’t beat the features or the price. I can’t imagine anyone I know actually going ahead and buying this thing, but we will see how that all pans out next year when it’s available for sale. This is going to be a hurdle that Apple doesn’t jump over gracefully.

Alternatives to Clouds

Posted on June 1, 2014 by bluedepth

I’ve been toying around with a wonderful free utility from BitTorrent Labs called BTSync. You can find it here: http://www.bittorrent.com/sync.

What really drew my attention was the lack of centralized service that stands at the core of BitTorrent technology. It’s distributed, without any company or cloud provider dwelling in the background. All the hardware is owned by you, the “secret” code you use to share that identifies your sync experience also forms the encryption key so that the data that is flowing across the network is secure from prying eyes. Because you own all the hardware and encryption covers the data exchange, you can store whatever you like in your BTSync’ed folder and not have to worry about anyone else peeping over your shoulder or removing material from your storage without your knowledge or permission.

This free system has clients for workstations and mobile devices, so it really can be a drop-in replacement for services like Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, and SkyDrive. You can share the secret with anyone you like and anything you place on the folder set up with BTSync will synchronize across all the connected devices. You can also send “Read Only” secrets to sync your folders to people who you want to have your files but don’t want them deleting or changing your files and since this uses BitTorrent technology you won’t have to pay hosting fees and the more people share the data, the faster the system sends updates and changes and new data to all the subscribers.

I’ve created a Work folder, a Sync folder and have them set up on my work machine, my work laptop, my Mac Mini at home, and my iPhone and iPad. Since I own all the hardware, the maximum storage that I can store on this system is only limited by the smallest storage unit amongst all the shared machines. The folder lives on a 1TB USB HD at home, at work I have hundreds of GB’s available and the same as on the laptop. The storage in Mobile isn’t the same as a full workstation as the BTSync app doesn’t actually download data to store on the mobile devices directly but rather downloads a file list making it possible for you to pick and choose what you need on mobile when you need it. If you need security in the storage components you could leverage Encrypted Disk Images in Mac systems and TrueCrypt Encrypted Volumes on Windows machines. For Linux clients, you could likely use loop filesystems set with EncFS or something like that.

The applications for BTSync are amazing. Freed from middlemen companies I can store anything I like without having to worry about some company evaluating what I’m storing or even being able to respond to warrants to reveal what I’m storing on the service. Something like this could be a great benefit to companies that need to share files without having to worry about “buying into the Cloud” since everything is free. You can run a BTSync on a server, host a folder and share the secret out to all your employees and have a very handy share drive and even if your central server fails, copies of your data are stored on all the connected workstations so to recover the data all you would need to do is download the small BTSync client again, re-establish the shared secret code, identify a folder and watch as all your connected clients swarm and return all your data back to the “central depot” server.

Another wonderful option is to host a family shared folder, where you can store anything you like, securely and backed up amongst all the connected workstations. Alternatively, if you were an aspiring artist you could place a folder with all your work and establish a read-only secret and publish it on your social networks. Not only would all your fans be able to have your work, but you’d also be able to cleverly transform them into a swarm of willing backup sources for your work. If an artist has their secret code and a copy of BTSync client and they lose their primary system and all their data, they can just get a new system, re-establish the client and secret and smile as all their work comes back home as it was stored on all your fans computers. That’s amazing to me!

Getting started using this utility is a snap. Download the client and install it on your system. Then on whatever storage medium you like create a new folder. In the BTSync application itself you can create a new shared folder with a single click, there is a “Generate” button which creates the shared secret for you, you can then determine if you want it to be full-sync or read-only sync and then point the app to the folder you want to share, then minimize the app and you’re all set. Send the shared secret code to anyone you want to share with and your data will immediately be sent to their systems according to your preferences.

BTSync is the best of all worlds. You have a secure cloud infrastructure without anyone in your way, judging you or risking any intrusions from companies or governments.

Microsoft in the Cloud

Posted on March 7, 2014 by bluedepth

A good question comes to mind, will companies like Microsoft, unhappy with individual flashes of purchasing, like 10,000 units of Windows XP, would rather migrate their users into a cloud infrastructure that replaced these discrete purchases into a steady stream of what amounts to being rental income? It’s starting with Azure and the new CEO has said cloud is the future. This may be where they are heading.

Microsoft might try to corner their own hardware market eventually, shepherding their customers into a cloud model, where you pay for a Windows 9 experience, connecting to Microsoft’s own hardware over the Internet. It would eliminate a huge sector of headaches for Microsoft, as they have never been truly able to strictly control the hardware their operating system runs on, unlike Apple. With a VM of Windows 9 that is remote controllable, Microsoft could provide a channel for their customers to use their suite of applications, achieving a silo lock-in. Instead of selling a license to use Windows 9, Microsoft could simply sell a $50 per month lease to computing resources within Microsoft. The sales pitch and marketing could be incredibly lucrative for Microsoft. Having a virtual OS canned with every application Microsoft makes available for a certain low per-month price, and altering that price based on the performance specifications of the VM ordered, so that clerical staff who need a basic interface can come in at $20 per month and developers who need more can come in at $200 per month.

That would eliminate many hurdles for IT administrators, the client machines could be thin clients, cookie cutter boxes with very little technology in them beyond the human interface components and the network connection. Storage, the VM instances, security, antivirus, the entire ball of wax could be handled by Microsoft itself, playing host to their customers and transforming their entire model from that of a classic production model to a new cloud-based leasing model. It would likely lower their profits for a short time, but the curve would not be so choppy, it would be smooth as leasing models, while working, are steady streams of money.

The risk to this possibility comes from the shift of importance from the local hardware to remote hardware. The weak link is the network itself. Virtual machine technology plays a part in this shift of risk, when you start putting more than one egg in a basket, you really have to concentrate on making sure your basket never fails. In this case, if the network link goes down, the entire affair disappears as if it wasn’t even there. This risk could be mitigated by establishing redundant network connections or having some sort of stop-gap measure devised where a host machine is shipped and installed to perform as a surrogate until the primary system returns to function. I don’t see this being a huge risk, as the Internet was designed to be very resilient to link failures as it is. It would come down to the last-mile service provider and the electrical grid maintaining service.

It’s something that is interesting to think about. Microsoft could do this, and it could revolutionize their business model and perhaps give them an edge in the enterprise level market. Only time will tell.

Bluedepth's Journal

Thoughts & Opinions

Category Archives: Security